My main gripe with Microsoft Windows

One of my main gripes about Microsoft Windows is one that has been around for years as far as I am aware; which is that the OS seems to ‘permit’ services, processes etc to consume 100% of the CPU. 

I mean, that’s what you want, right?  Especially if the computer is idle, but when a user starts interacting, I’d prefer it if Windows then decides to ‘cap’ the CPU usage of background processes and services, leaving a dynamic allocation of CPU time purely to service the user’s interactions and the processes they kick off.    Therefore when I move my mouse, Windows drops the process priority of other processes and dedicates some to my mouse movement, to Explorer to load windows and parse folders and files.  If I then launch Google Chrome, if the memory and CPU usage can’t be used with the bucket allocated to the user, then it will resize that bucket, giving the user more and dropping the priority of background processes even further.

Then, as Windows monitors user interactivity and perhaps user pauses what they’re doing for a minute or so, it dynamically adjusts the limits again and allows processes (user or background) to consume as much as they need, until; again user interaction is detected.

The main idea is to prevent a user’s experience from being dramatically slowed … that should never happen.

Above: An example screenshot of my laptop Windows 10 with CPU running at 100%. This kind of load may not last, but even when it is occurring, it’s negative impact on usability of Windows is significant and shouldn’t really be happening these days, I feel

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s